| DEPARTMENT
OF CRIMINOLOGY & CRIMINAL JUSTICE Dr. Michael Boudreau Office:
Brian Mulroney Hall, Room 404 COURSE DESCRIPTION
Criminology 4143A is a seminar course which explores the historical and contemporary incidence of hate crime and hate speech, and the laws that have been implemented to combat these crimes. This course will provide an in-depth examination of why hate crime and hate speech occurs, the targets and victims of hate crime and hate speech, the composition of hate groups, and the response of the State, especially the criminal justice system, and society, notably non-governmental organizations and the media, to hate crime and hate speech. Criminology 4143A will also assess the impact that hate crime and hate speech have had upon victims, the law, culture, politics, and society. This course will pay particular attention to the ethnic, gender, sexual, religious, and class dimensions of the victims of hate crime and hate speech, and of the movements and individuals who perpetrate these crimes. A series of seminar discussions, oral presentations, written assignments, and documentaries, will allow students to critically analyze and debate hate crime and hate speech, along with the laws that prohibit them. PREREQUISITES REQUIRED
TEXT REQUIRED
READINGS GRADING
& DUE DATES GRADING
SCHEME Students may consult the 2009-2010 St. Thomas University Calendar (Pages 282-283) for a detailed definition of these letter grades, as well as their corresponding grade points. The Calendar is available at http://w3.stu.ca/stu/administrative/registrar/services/calendar.aspx DEADLINES
& EXTENSIONS All written assignments must be submitted in hard-copy format. I will not accept a written assignment in an e-mail attachment. Students will be assessed a late penalty of 10% of each assignment’s value for each day that the assignment is overdue. This includes weekends and holidays. Extensions will only be granted with a valid medical excuse. Otherwise, extensions will not be given. DISABILITY UNIVERSITY
POLICY ON CLASSROOM CONDUCT Given the sensitive nature of the material in this course, students should be especially vigilant in allowing everyone in the class the opportunity to express their views and to respect the opinions of their colleagues. UNIVERSITY
POLICY ON CLASS ATTENDANCE As the 2009-2010 Calendar states: “Regular attendance is expected of students at all classes. In general, the responsibility for meeting this obligation rests with the student. It is the responsibility of students to notify their instructors when they expect to be, or have been, absent from class for any justifiable reason...It is the prerogative of the instructor to determine when a student’s scholastic standing in any course is being affected adversely by repeated absences.” (Emphasis added. Page 278) DISMISSAL
FROM THE COURSE UNIVERSITY
REGULATION ON ELECTRONIC DEVICES IN THE CLASSROOM The seminar readings are intended to facilitate discussion and debate on a range of key topics and themes in the study of hate crime and hate speech. Students are required to complete all of the assigned readings before each seminar and to actively participate in the discussions. All of the 25% will be determined on the basis of a student’s ability to offer their critical interpretation of the readings and to contribute to the seminar discussion in an intelligent and constructive manner. Those students who do not participate, on a continuous basis, in the seminar discussions, will not receive a passing grade in this portion of Criminology 4143A. Moreover, frequent absences from class will significantly reduce a student’s seminar participation mark. HATE
CRIME LAW REPORT In a minimum of FOUR (4) and a maximum of FIVE (5) double-spaced, type-written pages (12pt. font), which does not include the title page, references, and the works cited section or bibliography, students must select TWO (2) hate crime laws and compare and contrast how these laws define and punish hate crime, along with the individuals, groups, and categories, that are protected by these laws. This report should also outline when and why these laws were adopted. Please note that in addition to the hate crime laws, students must utilize TWO (2) academic sources (books published by academic presses and articles in academic journals), to complete this assignment. Most websites, encyclopedias (printed and on-line versions, such as Wikipedia), and magazine articles, are not academic sources, and thus will not be accepted for this assignment. A hand-out for this assignment is posted on WebCT. HATE
SPEECH CASE REPORT In a minimum of EIGHT (8) and a maximum of TEN (10) double-spaced, type-written pages (12pt. font), which does not include the title page, references, and the works cited section or bibliography, students must critically assess the decision in the case of Richard Warman and Canadian Human Rights Commission and Northern Alliance and Jason Ouwendyk, before the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal. The text of this decision is available at http://chrt-tcdp.gc.ca/search/files/t1216_2807chrt10.pdf On 13 March 2009, the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal ruled that Mr. Jason Ouwendyk and the Northern Alliance had communicated hate messages in violation of Section 13 (1) of the Canadian Human Rights Act.
Students must decide whether or not the decision, and the remedies,
in this case were warranted and in accordance with the provisions
of the Canadian Human Rights Act. They must also decide if the internet
postings made by Mr. Ouwendyk and the Northern Alliance were likely
to expose members of the targeted groups to hatred or contempt and
thus constituted a discriminatory practice. Please note that in addition to the Tribunal’s decision, students must utilize THREE (3) academic sources (books published by academic presses and articles in academic journals), to complete this assignment. Most websites, encyclopedias (printed and on-line versions, such as Wikipedia), and magazine articles, are not academic sources, and thus will not be accepted for this assignment. A hand-out for this assignment is posted on WebCT. ORAL
PRESENTATION Students should introduce their topic, explain why it is a hate crime or an example of hate speech, outline the relevance of the topic to the study of hate crime and/or hate speech, along with their tentative thesis and conclusion. Students will be assessed on the clarity and organization of their presentation, in addition to their understanding of the topic and the strength of their research. There will be a brief class discussion at the conclusion of the each student’s oral presentation. This discussion will be considered as part of students’ overall seminar participation. Those students who are unable to give their presentation on the assigned date, due to a medical emergency, will give their presentation during the next class.
A hand-out for the oral presentation is posted on WebCT. Students may choose any topic which focuses on hate crime and/or hate speech. Topics may include, but are not limited to: hate crime or hate speech laws; significant hate crime or hate speech trials; victims of hate crimes and/or hate speech; hate groups and/or their leaders; and the cultural representations of hate groups. Students must, in a minimum of EIGHTEEN (18) and a maximum of TWENTY-FIVE (25) double-spaced, type-written pages (12pt. font), which does not include the title page, references, and the works cited section or bibliography, present a well written and cogently argued analysis of their topic. This analysis must include a discussion of the topic’s influence upon the understanding of hate crime and/or hate speech and its impact upon the law and society generally. Students must only use academic sources to complete the Research Paper. Most websites, encyclopedias (printed or on-line versions, such as Wikipedia), and magazine articles, are not academic sources, and thus will not be accepted for this assignment. In addition to academic sources, students must use at least TWO (2) primary research documents to complete this assignment. Examples of primary research documents include, but are not limited to: The Criminal Code of Canada; The Canadian Human Rights Act; The Charter of Rights and Freedoms; The United Nations Charter on Human Rights; Newspapers; Royal Commissions; Public Inquiries; Judicial and Tribunal Decisions; Police and Government Reports on hate crime and hate speech; Laws and Acts that prohibit hate crime and hate speech; and literature and websites from hate groups and organizations devoted to fighting hate crime and hate speech.
A hand-out for this assignment is posted on WebCT. If a student submits a written assignment which does not contain references (APA, Footnotes, or Endnotes), they will receive a grade of ZERO (0%) on that assignment. Students are encouraged to speak with me about any difficulties that they may encounter while preparing their written assignments for this course. Similarly, once an assignment has been graded, I will only discuss a student’s mark with them in person, in my office, not over the phone or via e-mail. Students should make an appointment with me to discuss their mark. As part of this discussion, students must come prepared with a cogently written argument as to why their grade on a particular assignment should be changed. ACADEMIC
MISCONDUCT (PLAGIARISM) In essence, plagiarism is using the research and ideas of others, without properly acknowledging their work with quotation marks and/or references.
The 2009-2010 St. Thomas University Calendar (Page 285) states that
plagiarism includes, but is not limited to: Purchasing an essay from a website, or from another person, and submitting it as original work, is also a form of plagiarism. The procedures that will be followed in cases of plagiarism are outlined on pages 285-287 of the 2009-2010 Calendar. Students should also consult the University’s Policy on Academic Misconduct, which is available at: http://w3.stu.ca/stu/administrative/vp_academic/_content/academic_misconduct.pdf CRIMINOLOGY
RESOURCES Marc Bragdon is the Criminology Librarian. Please feel free to speak with him about your research projects. His office hours for the Winter Semester are Wednesday, 10:00am-Noon, room 317D in the library. If you cannot locate his office, please ask for assistance at the Research Help Desk on the main floor of the library. Appointments may also be made with Mr. Bradgon. His e-mail address is mbragdon@unb.ca. The Gerard V. La Forest Law Library (http://lawlibrary.unbf.ca) is located on the second floor of Ludlow Hall on the UNB campus. The Law Library is an excellent source of research material for this course. In particular, students should consult the e-Resources category which appears on the library’s website. The Criminal Code of Canada is also available at the Law Library and on-line at: http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/C-46/index.html. HATE
CRIME WEBSITES RESEARCH
SOURCES ON COURSE RESERVE ACADEMIC
JOURNALS
Students must complete all of the assigned readings for each seminar. These readings include Chakraborti and Garland, Hate Crime and supplemental readings which will be distributed in class on a weekly basis.
THIS COURSE SCHEDULE & ITS CONTENTS 1. Monday, 18 January 2010
CONCEPTUALIZING HATE CRIME, HATE SPEECH, & THEIR PERPETRATORS DOCUMENTARY - HEARTS OF HATE 2. Monday, 25 January 2010
THE IMPACT OF HATE CRIME & HATE SPEECH
3. Monday, 1 February 2010
IDEOLOGIES OF HATE
4. Monday, 8 February 2010
RAHOWA: MODERN HATE GROUPS
DOCUMENTARY - SKINHEADS, RACE WAR 5. Monday, 15 February 2010
HATE CRIMES AGAINST THE “OTHER”
DOCUMENTARY - SHAKE HANDS WITH THE DEVIL 6. Monday, 22 February 2010 “HOMO-CIDE”
AGAINST “QUEERS”:
DOCUMENTARY - THE LARAMIE PROJECT 7. Monday, 1 March 2010 MID-TERM BREAK - CLASS IS CANCELLED! 8. Monday, 8 March 2010
HATE SPEECH, FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION, & THE LAW
9. Monday, 15 March 2010 POLICING
HATE CRIME
10. Monday, 22 March 2010 STUDENTS’ ORAL PRESENTATIONS! 11. Monday, 29 March 2010 STUDENTS’ ORAL PRESENTATIONS! 12. Monday, 5 April 2010 EASTER MONDAY - CLASS IS CANCELLED! 13. Monday, 12 April 2010
RESPONDING TO & COMBATTING HATE CRIME & HATE SPEECH
RESEARCH PAPERS ARE DUE IN CLASS AT 2:30pm! RESEARCH
PAPERS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED AFTER THIS DATE & TIME WITHOUT A VALID
MEDICAL EXCUSE! |